Leah Callon-Butler, a CoinDesk columnist, is the director of Emfarsis, a consulting firm focused on the role of technology in advancing economic development in Asia.
Is crypto fintech?
When I posed the question to a few of my favorite crypto discussion forums across Telegram and Whatsapp, it clearly hit a nerve. The responses ranged from the philosophical:
fintech is a sector, an industry that regroups a collection of businesses, startups, applications.
Crypto is a discipline: science, philosophy and of course a community.
I will give an example: collectibles and crypto art are part of “crypto” but I don’t believe they fit in “fintech”fintech is finance + technology.
Crypto technology can be used to disrupt finance.
To the structural:
literally yes, culturally no.
there is a subset of crypto which is fintech, but not all crypto is fintech.
it’s a venn diagram with a huge overlap, but neither is full inside the other. plenty of non-financial crypto and plenty of non-crypto fintech. and culturally they are way different.
I’m kind of sick of fintech tbh. They wear t shirts but secretly we know they’re suits
To the categorical:
Is bitcoin financial technology? I would say it’s the only true financial innovation tackling the core of all finance, which is money itself. Most of “fintech” is lipstick on a pig. There’s no real tech most of the time. And all centralized.
Bitcoin is the first real NEW financial technology since…i dunno, since double entry bookkeeping? And from bitcoin, the pandora’s box was opened for everything else. … It will alter society in ways we can’t even imagine just yet.
A payment app by a bank won’t do that. Hehe
Based on these passionate declarations, it would seem that those who live and breathe crypto vehemently reject the fintech label. They view fintech as a mere iteration on the incumbent rails of traditional finance, while crypto is building something inherently transformational, coming from a fundamentally different place in terms of culture, identity and motivation.
Apolline Blandin, Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Lead at the Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance (CCAF), in the U.K., believes that a crypto-asset perfectly fits its definition of alternative finance as a monetary system emerging outside the traditional one. “More importantly, it is aligned with our mission to unearth data about emerging industries,” said Blandin.
They view fintech as a mere iteration on the incumbent rails of traditional finance, while crypto is building something inherently transformational.
CCAF, a research center at the University of Cambridge Judge Business School, was set up in 2015 to provide accessible fintech market insights to inform decision-making by policy makers, regulators and industry. In 2016, crypto and blockchain were added to its agenda.
Right now, CCAF is undertaking a study to understand how COVID-19 has impacted the global fintech landscape. Partnered with the World Bank Group and World Economic Forum, fintechs of all shapes and sizes are being asked to fill out a survey by 31 July 2020. It only takes 30 minutes to complete and is available in 10 languages, but some crypto companies won’t even click on the link because they don’t identify as fintech.
The word fintech has become about as impactful as other overworked, misused words like disruption and innovation. So, in an effort to establish a lexicon that better portrays the true breadth, depth and complexity of the ecosystem, CCAF developed a taxonomy guide (see chart) that identifies 15 verticals, 11 subsets and 102 possible categories of financial services outside the traditional sector. These include digital lending and capital raising, mobile payments and remittance, “WealthTech,” “InsureTech” and “RegTech,” and of course, crypto and blockchain.
“I think a lot of people hear the buzzword and silo it,” said Tania Ziegler, CCAF’s Lead in Global Alternative Finance Benchmarking, about the term crypto. “But we’ve got crypto asset exchanges, market provisioning, digital custody and consensus services – so that’s effectively four different overarching verticles where a crypto could live.”
Even so, some in crypto are about as keen on being dumped in the fintech bucket as they are about dealing with increasing regulatory scrutiny. Crypto OGs tend to dislike this kind of encroachment because they see it as antithetical to the purpose of Bitcoin – that is, to provide an electronic cash system based on privacy and disintermediation.
Ziegler recalls that digital lending platforms felt similarly irrelevant to fintech when they burst onto the scene around 2010. “It’s natural, as the space is evolving, to have these existential questions, especially where there are use cases that are not purely financial,” she said.
In recent years, crypto has attracted a level of mainstream attention that means the authorities can’t ignore it (especially after the 2017 run up, and less favorably, with last week’s big Twitter hack). This has pros and cons. Being recognised as a valid entity comes with certain privileges for crypto companies, such as being able to open a bank account. But it also comes with regulatory responsibilities.
And when the regulators are doing their planning for 2021, they’ll be referencing aggregated sources of industry data like CCAF’s COVID-19 study (the report is due in September). Under these circumstances, as much as crypto might insist upon its uniqueness, if it refuses to participate under the common fintech banner, it risks being overlooked by the kind of decision makers who are far less emotionally invested in the definition.