At a basic level, most work style and personality preference assessments plot you and your team on a continuum from introverted to extroverted and from task-oriented to people-oriented.
The point of such exercises is not to be deterministic about who you are or how you work, or, worse, to stereotype people, but rather to give you and your colleagues some shared language around your expressed preferences and to make you aware of some of the opposing poles of those leanings.
With the caveats that it’s dangerous to fall into stereotypes and that we’re all unique individuals, I think of the primary quadrants of all work style assessments this way:
Analyzer: introverted, task-oriented
The analyzer is very deliberate about decisions and constantly seeks data on which to base any action or reaction. As a result, they’ll be rigorous and prevent you from falling into an intuitive trap that lacks data-driven support. They have trouble acting without data, though, and because they’re task-oriented, they can be less good at collaboration, process building, and bringing people along with their decisions and actions.
Director: extroverted, task-oriented
Directors have strong opinions about the “right” answer and a bias toward rapid action because they care a lot about getting to the proper outcomes quickly. They’re great at establishing a vision but want everyone to align with it. They often do the work themselves because they don’t enjoy building processes and feel confident about exactly what steps need to be taken, which can disempower others.
Promoter: extroverted, people-oriented
These talented individuals are charismatic and people-oriented. They have a lot of ideas and the ability to articulate an inspiring narrative. They don’t like details or administration, and they’re usually great starters but not always finishers. They can see the big picture and excel at inspiring others and building relationships.
Collaborator: introverted, people-oriented
These employees care a lot about the customer, be it an internal customer (an employee at the company) or an external one (a product user). Given this inclination, collaborators often build great systems to bring others along. Conversely, people-oriented builders tend to overcomplicate things because they don’t want to leave anyone out. They may create a process everyone can agree on, but that doesn’t benefit the organization. For example, you might end up with a process in which practically everyone on a team gets to meet a job candidate, but the time in process for that candidate might be 90 days.
Pay attention for progress
None of these work style preferences is objectively better or worse than the others. Often, however, one might be better or worse in specific circumstances. For example, during a technical outage, you want to have systems in place that allow a small set of individuals to make a lot of big decisions quickly. You may not care that much about getting longer-term buy-in from others because you need action to be taken immediately.
You need a director. If you’re trying to build a planning process that enables you to decide what teams are going to work on for the next year, you probably want to build something that will endure and help people understand the importance of the work. You could do all the planning yourself with a select group of people you trust, but that would mean leaving out the people who actually have to do the work. Plus, you wouldn’t be helping them develop the skills they need for future planning cycles. You need a collaborator, and probably a promoter, too.
Much of this dimension of self-awareness comes down to paying attention. Consider when you feel energized, when you feel drained, and when you feel like you’re reaching new heights at your job or hitting new lows. You’ll start to see patterns. If you have trouble trusting your own instincts, ask someone whose judgment you respect: When have you seen me do my best and worst work? This increased awareness helps an individual execute better.